Canonical Question
Resp – Capnography
Master answer
PaCO2
- Factors affecting PaCO2
- Rate of metabolism and CO2 production
- FiCO2 (usually negligable)
- Alveolar ventilation
- Increased alveolar ventilation decreased PaCO2
End-Tidal CO2
- CO2 contained in gas at the end of tidal expiration
- Contains:
- Alveolar CO2
- High CO2 diffusion – PACO2 = PaCO2
- Only 0.7mmHg Alveolar-arterial CO2 gradient for 10% shunt
- Alveolar Dead Space CO2
- Anatomical – conducting airways
- Physiological – West zone 1 / Apex
- Varies with posture and pathology
- Alveolar CO2
- Measured by capnometer
- In-line or side-stream
- Used IR absorbance at 4.23 μm
- Side-stream: lag in CO2 detection due to increased dead space between respiratory tract and analyzer

End-tidal to Arterial PaCO2 difference
- Normal ETCO2 – PaCO2 ~5mmHg
- Can be due to Artificially low ETCO2 or Artificially High PaCO2
Artificially low ETCO2
- Dead space (VD)
- Assumed PCO2 however usually low pCO2 but non 0 pCO2
- Contributes to ETCO2-PaCO2 ~5mmHg
- Pathological ↑VD
- ↑alveolar dead space (normal individuals = 0)
- Mixing of gas between perfused and non-perfused alveoli → ETCO2 < PaCO2
- Equivalent to ↑ West Zone 1
- → PE, hypotension, excess PEEP/IPPV
- COAD – poor perfusion of hyper-expanded alveoli
- ↑alveolar dead space (normal individuals = 0)
- Closing capacity (CC):
- Usually 40 CC may exceed FRC
- ↑ Airways collapse/gas trapping → airways closure → ↑alveolar pCO2 within alveoli not exhaling
- Exacerbated by
- low volume ventilation close to FRC
- High FiO2 for extended periods → denitrogenation → loss of airways splinting = CC closer to FRC
- Usually 40 CC may exceed FRC
- Sampling line problems:
- Too far from trachea (ie ↑ mechanical dead space)
- Too long – unable to adequately sample as gas is trapped in line
- Air leakage/line blockage leading to measurement error with entraining of room air, loss of expired air
- Machine:
- Loss of calibration of sampling unit
- Excess H2O in water trap interfering with measurement
- Interference from other gases (N2O) artificially raises ETCO2 due to interference with IR absorber “Collision broadening”
- Incorrect timing of measurement
- Inadequate expiration time → failing to reach plateau = incomplete alveolar expiration = falsely low ETCO2
Artificially high PaCO2
- Should be measured from arterial sample
- Venous sampling will artificially ↑pCO2
- Loss of calibration of machine
Gladwin / Sakurai 2016
Exam appearances
| Exam | Exact wording | Relationship | Success |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007B Q24 | Explain the causes of the differences between measured end tidal and arterial partial pressures of carbon dioxide. | historical_member | — |
| 2009A Q09 | Explain the causes of the difference between measured end tidal and arterial partial pressures of carbon dioxide. | historical_member | — |
| 2017A Q21 | Explain the potential causes of a difference between the measured end tidal CO2 and the arterial partial pressure of CO2. | historical_member | — |
| 2018B Q03 | Explain the causes of the differences between measured end tidal and arterial partial pressures of carbon dioxide (CO2). | historical_member | — |